Viet-Nam is far away from this quiet campus. We have no territory
there, nor do we seek any. The war is dirty and brutal and
difficult. And some 400 young men, born into an America that is
bursting with opportunity and promise, have ended their lives on
Viet-Nam’s steaming soil.
Why must we take this painful road?
Why must this nation hazard its ease, its interest, and its power
for the sake of a people so far away?
We fight because we must fight if we are to live in a world where
every country can shape its own destiny, and only in such a world
will our own freedom be finally secure.
This kind of world will never be built by bombs or bullets. Yet the
infirmities of man are such that force must often precede reason and
the waste of war, the works of peace.
We wish this were not so. But we must deal with the world as it is,
if it is ever to be as we wish.
The world as it is in Asia is not a serene or peaceful place.
The first reality is that North Viet-Nam has attacked the
independent nation of South Viet-Nam. Its object is total conquest.
Of course, some of the people of South Viet-Nam are participating in
attack on their own government. But trained men and supplies, orders
and arms, flow in a constant stream from North to South.
This support is the heartbeat of the war.
And it is a war of unparalleled brutality. Simple farmers are the
targets of assassination and kidnapping. Women and children are
strangled in the night because their men are loyal to the
government. And helpless villagers are ravaged by sneak attacks.
Large-scale raids are conducted on towns, and terror strikes in the
heart of cities.
The confused nature of this conflict cannot mask the fact that it is
the new face of an old enemy.
Over this war-and all Asia-is another reality: the deepening shadow
of Communist China. The rulers in Hanoi are urged on by Peking. This
is a regime which has destroyed freedom in Tibet, which has attacked
India and has been condemned by the United Nations for aggression in
Korea. It is a nation which is helping the forces of violence in
almost every continent. The contest in Viet-Nam is part of a wider
pattern of aggressive purposes.
Why are these realities our concern? Why are we in South Viet-Nam?
We are there because we have a promise to keep. Since 1954 every
American President has offered support to the people of South
Viet-Nam. We have helped to build, and we have helped to defend.
Thus, over many years, we have made a national pledge to help South
Viet-Nam defend its independence.
And I intend to keep that promise.
To dishonour that pledge, to abandon this small and brave nation to
its enemies, and to the terror that must follow, would be an
We are also there to strengthen world order. Around the globe from
Berlin to Thailand are people whose well being rests in part on the
belief that they can count on us if they are attacked. To leave
Viet-Nam to its fate would shake the confidence of all these people
in the value of an American commitment and in the value of America’s
word. The result would be increased unrest and instability, even
We are also there because there are great stakes in the balance. Let
no one think for a minute that retreat from Viet-Nam would bring an
end to the conflict. The battle would be renewed in one country and
then another. The central lesson of our time is that the appetite of
aggression is never satisfied. To withdraw from one battlefield
means only to prepare for the next. We must say in Southeast Asia-as
we did in Europe-in the words of the Bible: "Hitherto shalt thou
come, but no further."
There are those who say that all our effort there will be
futile-that China’s power is such that it is bound to dominate all
southeast Asia. But there is no end to that argument until all of
the nations of Asia are swallowed up.
There are those who wonder why we have a responsibility there. Well.
we have it there for the same reason that we have a responsibility
for the defence of Europe. World War II was fought in both Europe
and Asia, and when it ended we found ourselves with continued
responsibility for the defence of freedom.
Our objective is the independence of South Viet-Nam, and its freedom
from attack. We want nothing for ourselves-only that the people of
South Viet-Nam be allowed to guide their own country in their own
We will do everything necessary to reach that objective. And we will
do only what is absolutely necessary.
In recent months attacks on South Viet-Nam were stepped up. Thus, it
became necessary for us to increase our response and to make attacks
by air. This is not a change of purpose. It is a change in what we
believe that purpose requires.
We do this in order to slow down aggression.
We do this to increase the confidence of the brave people of South
Viet-Nam who have bravely borne this brutal battle for so many years
with so many casualties.
And we do this to convince the leaders of North Viet-Nam-and all who
seek to share their conquest-of a simple fact:
We will not be defeated.
We will not grow tired.
We will not withdraw, either openly or under the cloak of a
We know that air attacks alone will not accomplish all of these
purposes. But it is our best and prayerful judgment that they are a
necessary part of the surest road to peace.
We hope that peace will come swiftly. But that is in the hands of
others besides ourselves. And we must be prepared for a long
continued conflict. It will require patience as well as bravery, the
will to endure as well as the will to resist.
I wish it were possible to convince others with words of what we now
find it necessary to say with guns and planes: Armed hostility is
futile. Our resources are equal to the challenge. Because we fight
for values and we fight for principles, rather than territory or
colonies, our patience and our determination are unending...